Technology Growth Rate
Table of Contents
This section describes trends in fuel cell technology, with particular emphasis on the question: "How rapidly is fuel cell research growing?"
Publication Profile
Table 1 profiles the total articles published on fuel cell technology each year from 1987 to 1997.
Table 1: Publication Profile
| Database | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | Total Articles |
| ENGI | 214 | 152 | 111 | 173 | 193 | 205 | 207 | 289 | 280 | 241 | 290 | 2,355 |
| PATS | 95 | 86 | 95 | 80 | 82 | 95 | 116 | 134 | 123 | 120 | 128 | 1,154 |
| SCI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 149 | 126 | 175 | 189 | 269 | 241 | 1,149 |
| BUSI | N/A | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 29 | 35 | 25 | 29 | 74 | 210 |
Fig 4: Publication Profile - Fuel Cell
Technology
The trend in publications from Engineering Index (ENGI) exhibits two
interesting phenomena (Fig. 4):
Equally compelling is the consistent trend in U.S. Patents (PATS). Despite
the decline in publication, the trend in patent production has been relatively
level from 1987 to 1992, followed by steady growth.
Data from Science Citation Index (SCI) and Business Index (BUSI) are
limited to 1988-1997 and 1992-1997 respectively, yet these trends support
the general growth trends.
Fig 5: Trends in Fuel Cell Technology
The publication trends for the five fuel cell types in ENGI mirror the
general trend with fuel cell technology (Fig. 5). All five types
display sharp declines in the late 1980's reaching the nadir in 1988-89.
This time period marks a turning point for the specific fuel cell technologies.
Following are some observations:
Growth Rate Indicator
The rate of growth in publications was analyzed for each of the fuel cell
types. The growth rate indicator is calculated by the formula: sum
of { articles in year i+1 / articles in year i }. Table 2 presents
the ranking of 10-year growth and 5-year growth rates for each fuel cell
type.
Table 2: Fuel Cell Growth Rate
| Rank | 10-year Growth | 5-year Growth |
| 1 | SOFC (12.51) | SOFC (6.98) |
| 2 | PEMFC (12.09) | AFC (5.83) |
| 3 | AFC (10.83) | MCFC (5.16) |
| 4 | MFC (10.14) | PEMFC (4.92) |
| 5 | PAFC (9.61) | PAFC (4.58) |
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are the fastest growing fuel cell technology
over a 5-year and 10-year period. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC)
follow closely in growth over the 10-year period. Molten carbonate fuel
cells (MCFC) and alkaline fuel cells (AFC) had slightly higher growth than
phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAFC) over the same period.
Significant fluctuations publication levels for AFC's and MCFC's over
the past 5 years create a misleading picture of their overall growth. The
5-year growth rate ranks them both ahead of PEMFC's and PAFC's.
Communication Rate Indicator
Another indicator of growth is the ratio of conference to journal articles.
The communication rate is calculated by taking the ratio of the total conference
articles divided by the total journal articles. It is assumed that conference
publications tend to publish the most recent technological advances, while
journals are hindered by their inherent review process. Thus, a higher
rate indicates a 'hotter' technology in terms of the interest in publishing
topical information more rapidly. Cross-field comparisons must be
made with care as publishing practices do vary by field.
Fig 6: Fuel Cell Communication Rate
For the period from 1987 to 1997, the communication rate averaged 0.434.
The communication rate for fuel cell technology declined sharply in the
late 1980's. It rebounded in 1990 and fell in the early 1990's. Since 1994,
the rate has remained steady averaging 0.258; this indicates that conferences
contributed only one-fourth (25.8%) of the total articles from journal
sources.
Table 3: Fuel Cell Communication Rate
| Rank | Communication Rate |
| 1 | PAFC (.665) |
| 2 | PEMFC (.497) |
| 3 | MCFC (.397) |
| 4 | AFC (.309) |
| 5 | SOFC (.181) |
From 1987 to 1997, the communication rate for specific fuel cell types
is surprising. PAFC's had the highest rate of 0.665, suggesting that many
conferences have addressed these fuel cells. Only PAFC's and PEMFC's had
higher than average rates. The lowest rate is attributed to SOFC's, over
3 times less than PAFC's.
1The total 1997 items in ENGI as of this analysis was XXXX.
This is somewhat less than the average for years XXX. We chose not
to normalize so that counts are actual. Were one so inclined, multiplication
of 1997 values by XX would eliminate the downward tendency for 1997.